Omicron was first sequenced in Botswana and according to reports the samples came from four visiting diplomats. I’m sure they were wearing Ray-bans and carrying briefcases with copies of the CIA handbook.
“They confirmed that the samples had come from four foreign nationals, visiting diplomats who tested positive for COVID-19 on November 11. Officials haven’t confirmed where the diplomats travelled from, saying they want to avoid stigmatising other nations, but Botswana’s president stated in an interview with CNN that at least some had “been to Europe”.”
This is the response I got, which just shows how far the Church of Scotland have retreated into their shell in terms of defending their faith. I replied. Asking what they are going to do to protect the religious rights of their congregation.
Thank you for your enquiry, which has been passed to me by my colleagues
Please be assured that we note your concern, and that the Church remains vigilant and concerned for this and many other issues which face us as a society, including human rights, and the rights to freedom of expression and religion
Well that is heart breaking. That is not of Christ, that is of politics. A response that any aid to anyone in worldly public office would put out for their boss who could not be bothered.
Yes, that's right. I'm thinking to keep pushing, and try to shame them into some kind of action, then make an article out of the issue. Will post something people can look at.
Ginger, you are the only person I've found on Substack or anywhere (I started a substack, The Coming Storm) who has even brought up the issue of the steamrollering of religious objections to vaccination. This is an issue that distresses me deeply. From my viewpoint the MRNA vaccines are an abomination from the viewpoint of "Let us make mankind in our image". If our DNA is changed we are no longer the creation of God. Do you know of any other avenues, publications or ways to express this or try to get churches to see this? Thanks. Rob
There are so few outlets talking about this, that I started https://nodeception.org/ four years ago. Your point is at the heart of it. What are we doing to ourselves physically and spiritually by partnering with darkness, injecting the DNA of aborted children into ourselves and our children. Mutating our DNA? This has been going on, widespread, since 1963. We have only upped the ante with the mRNA shots.
Oddly, there are still very few in the vast media reach of what we assumed was "The Church" that decry what is happening, or repent of their involvement in it. Most spiritual opposition to it has come out of right leaning, secular media. I have stopped listening to church media because of it. Would be smart to go back and see if anyone else is paying attention now.
You ask a good question. We should list such outlets here when we find them.
Thank you. Yesterday, I wrote to the Church of Scotland (where I live) to ask why so few in the church decry the shoving aside of religious exemption, and what is their current position on that. I made the point of genetically altered DNA being injected into humans as a violation of God's creation. I will see if they respond. Thank you for your support.
wrong. Phylogenetic analysis of full-length genome sequences obtained from infected patients showed that SARS-CoV-2 is similar to severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus (SARS-CoV) and not man made.
You seem to have misread the post. This is not about the initial SARS-CoV-2. This is about the Omicron variant and the evidence that it was not an organic evolution of SARS-CoV-2, but that the evidence shows that it is a man made variant. The papers you cite do not mention the Omicron variant.
I am confused. The mouse study was published in the Journal of Genetics and Genomics.
So your complaint the "Unnaturalness" paper is not about the information in the paper itself, simply that it is not published? Yet?
I was put into pre-print only 22 days ago. My assumption is that is being peer reviewed as we type.
But if not, is your position that these two researchers, Atsushi Tanaka of the Division of Research Animal Laboratory and Translational Medicine, Research and Development Center and the Osaka Medical and Pharmaceutical University, and Takayuki Miyazawa of Laboratory of Virus-Host Coevolution, Institute for Life and Medical Sciences, Kyoto University, probably don't have enough creds to earn our attention as soon as they are ready to say something?
Of course it is always up to the individual to choose whom to trust, and skepticism is important in science, so you are more than welcome to not trust it until it is peer-reviewed.
But I am interested in it now. I saw the signs two years ago. I have learned not to wait for the global research community's pharmaceutical sponsored to bless something before I take it seriously. They tend to lag a few years behind reality. Or a few decades behind it.
Variants arise via mutation, especially mutation when the immune system isn't present to slow down the replication that generates mutations. So one of the most likely places for a variant to appear is in an immunocompromised person who's been infected. "in a number of cases, variant emergence has been linked to long-term infections in individuals who were either immunocompromised or treated with convalescent plasma." https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-021-02148-8
So if "one of the most likely places for a variant to appear is in an immunocompromised person who's been infected," variants are not, and cannot, be made in a lab?
Again. You are arguing that things can happen organically, no one is disputing that.
The discussion is that in this case, evidence exists to show that this is not an organic evolution.
So how many millions of people have been infected in the world, how many of them have overt or occult immunosuppression that allows persistent infection (a lot more than you think I’ll bet).
I don't think these are the same "they." I think "They" made SARS-Cov-2 in China. I think another group of "them" made Omicron to counteract SARS-Cov-2 to act as a vaccine.
Omicron started fast, spread quickly, and had mild symptoms. The theory was that the Omicron strain was created by White Hats, to spread faster than SARS-Cov-2 that was more deadly, and created by the Black Hats. Thus Omicron would inoculate against SARS-Cov-2 without a vaccine. Or that it would act as a vaccine.
More on Jordon Trishton Walker and the current Pfizer funding of Gain of Function of viruses by insertion of the Furin Cleavage Site
https://geoffpain.substack.com/p/directed-evolution-gain-of-function
Kyoto uni link gone?
Human error. My bad.
Now fixed.
Omicron was first sequenced in Botswana and according to reports the samples came from four visiting diplomats. I’m sure they were wearing Ray-bans and carrying briefcases with copies of the CIA handbook.
“They confirmed that the samples had come from four foreign nationals, visiting diplomats who tested positive for COVID-19 on November 11. Officials haven’t confirmed where the diplomats travelled from, saying they want to avoid stigmatising other nations, but Botswana’s president stated in an interview with CNN that at least some had “been to Europe”.”
https://www.aljazeera.com/features/2021/12/14/inside-the-botswana-lab-that-discovered-omicron
Thank you for this.
This is the response I got, which just shows how far the Church of Scotland have retreated into their shell in terms of defending their faith. I replied. Asking what they are going to do to protect the religious rights of their congregation.
Thank you for your enquiry, which has been passed to me by my colleagues
Please be assured that we note your concern, and that the Church remains vigilant and concerned for this and many other issues which face us as a society, including human rights, and the rights to freedom of expression and religion
Well that is heart breaking. That is not of Christ, that is of politics. A response that any aid to anyone in worldly public office would put out for their boss who could not be bothered.
A "be warm and filled" response.
Yes, that's right. I'm thinking to keep pushing, and try to shame them into some kind of action, then make an article out of the issue. Will post something people can look at.
Ginger, you are the only person I've found on Substack or anywhere (I started a substack, The Coming Storm) who has even brought up the issue of the steamrollering of religious objections to vaccination. This is an issue that distresses me deeply. From my viewpoint the MRNA vaccines are an abomination from the viewpoint of "Let us make mankind in our image". If our DNA is changed we are no longer the creation of God. Do you know of any other avenues, publications or ways to express this or try to get churches to see this? Thanks. Rob
There are so few outlets talking about this, that I started https://nodeception.org/ four years ago. Your point is at the heart of it. What are we doing to ourselves physically and spiritually by partnering with darkness, injecting the DNA of aborted children into ourselves and our children. Mutating our DNA? This has been going on, widespread, since 1963. We have only upped the ante with the mRNA shots.
Oddly, there are still very few in the vast media reach of what we assumed was "The Church" that decry what is happening, or repent of their involvement in it. Most spiritual opposition to it has come out of right leaning, secular media. I have stopped listening to church media because of it. Would be smart to go back and see if anyone else is paying attention now.
You ask a good question. We should list such outlets here when we find them.
Thank you. Yesterday, I wrote to the Church of Scotland (where I live) to ask why so few in the church decry the shoving aside of religious exemption, and what is their current position on that. I made the point of genetically altered DNA being injected into humans as a violation of God's creation. I will see if they respond. Thank you for your support.
Do share any response you get.
wrong. Phylogenetic analysis of full-length genome sequences obtained from infected patients showed that SARS-CoV-2 is similar to severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus (SARS-CoV) and not man made.
https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10096-020-03899-4#Sec2
https://pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.2211107119
You seem to have misread the post. This is not about the initial SARS-CoV-2. This is about the Omicron variant and the evidence that it was not an organic evolution of SARS-CoV-2, but that the evidence shows that it is a man made variant. The papers you cite do not mention the Omicron variant.
I encourage you to read my post again.
the genetic sequence has been analyzed for omicron, literally hundreds of times. you cited a preprint typed up on a word document published nowhere.
Researchers can literally buy SARS-CoV-2 isolates. your fanatical claims lack any peer reviewed data supporting them
https://www.beiresources.org/BEIHighlights1.aspx?ItemId=79&ModuleId=14004
Additionally, when you said this, I feel like you are making my point for me.
"Researchers can literally buy SARS-CoV-2 isolates."
Right. So anyone with the will, knowledge, and equipment to alter the virus, can alter the virus. So what is stopping people from doing it?
You mocking this observation, and then pointing out that it is possible, is kinda strange.
I am confused. The mouse study was published in the Journal of Genetics and Genomics.
So your complaint the "Unnaturalness" paper is not about the information in the paper itself, simply that it is not published? Yet?
I was put into pre-print only 22 days ago. My assumption is that is being peer reviewed as we type.
But if not, is your position that these two researchers, Atsushi Tanaka of the Division of Research Animal Laboratory and Translational Medicine, Research and Development Center and the Osaka Medical and Pharmaceutical University, and Takayuki Miyazawa of Laboratory of Virus-Host Coevolution, Institute for Life and Medical Sciences, Kyoto University, probably don't have enough creds to earn our attention as soon as they are ready to say something?
Of course it is always up to the individual to choose whom to trust, and skepticism is important in science, so you are more than welcome to not trust it until it is peer-reviewed.
But I am interested in it now. I saw the signs two years ago. I have learned not to wait for the global research community's pharmaceutical sponsored to bless something before I take it seriously. They tend to lag a few years behind reality. Or a few decades behind it.
Variants arise via mutation, especially mutation when the immune system isn't present to slow down the replication that generates mutations. So one of the most likely places for a variant to appear is in an immunocompromised person who's been infected. "in a number of cases, variant emergence has been linked to long-term infections in individuals who were either immunocompromised or treated with convalescent plasma." https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-021-02148-8
further: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2588933821000558
So if "one of the most likely places for a variant to appear is in an immunocompromised person who's been infected," variants are not, and cannot, be made in a lab?
Again. You are arguing that things can happen organically, no one is disputing that.
The discussion is that in this case, evidence exists to show that this is not an organic evolution.
So how many millions of people have been infected in the world, how many of them have overt or occult immunosuppression that allows persistent infection (a lot more than you think I’ll bet).
your claims lack evidence supporting them
But why? Why would they make a less lethal variant when their goal is to form a world government and lock us down forever?
I don't think these are the same "they." I think "They" made SARS-Cov-2 in China. I think another group of "them" made Omicron to counteract SARS-Cov-2 to act as a vaccine.
Omicron started fast, spread quickly, and had mild symptoms. The theory was that the Omicron strain was created by White Hats, to spread faster than SARS-Cov-2 that was more deadly, and created by the Black Hats. Thus Omicron would inoculate against SARS-Cov-2 without a vaccine. Or that it would act as a vaccine.
Well I'd like to know who the white hats were, but then maybe the black hats would have them offed. What a world.
"They" want total control.