Exactly how CDC tried (and failed) to hide the 1135% increase in neurodevelopmental disorders found in children receiving the highest doses of mercury in the hepatitis B vaccine as opposed to 0 Hg.
I'm glad you went to a "fancy pants university" that taught you how to read scientific literature. Without that, maybe you wouldn't have been confident enough to attempt to figure out what happened to your son.
There is an account here on Substack offering a crash course on how to read scientific papers.
And I believe that James Lyons-Weiler offers a more in-depth course doing the same. We can't be content with letting the "experts" spoon feed us the information they want us to see, nor can we allow them to draw conclusions for us.
Ginger, I clicked on the link to your 2009 post about young naive irresponsible “science journalists,” and I have to say, God bless you, Ginger Taylor. I'm late to the party, having arrived at the vaccine-autism connection around 2015, but I appreciate all of your advocacy and information. The "science journalists," with their self-declared intellectual and moral superiority, remind me of Romans chapter 1.
"Claiming to be wise, they became fools...they exchanged the truth of God for falsehood, and worshiped and served the creature rather than the Creator."
It's nonsensical to remove the data of all the children who had other factors also associated with higher chances of neurodevelopmental disorders. Like you said, this study is used as the basis for vaccine policy for ALL CHILDREN, not just those who do not have any other risk factors.
And STILL the association didn't disappear after all that data manipulation!
I'm glad you went to a "fancy pants university" that taught you how to read scientific literature. Without that, maybe you wouldn't have been confident enough to attempt to figure out what happened to your son.
There is an account here on Substack offering a crash course on how to read scientific papers.
https://sciencedefined.com/challenge/
And I believe that James Lyons-Weiler offers a more in-depth course doing the same. We can't be content with letting the "experts" spoon feed us the information they want us to see, nor can we allow them to draw conclusions for us.
Ginger, I clicked on the link to your 2009 post about young naive irresponsible “science journalists,” and I have to say, God bless you, Ginger Taylor. I'm late to the party, having arrived at the vaccine-autism connection around 2015, but I appreciate all of your advocacy and information. The "science journalists," with their self-declared intellectual and moral superiority, remind me of Romans chapter 1.
"Claiming to be wise, they became fools...they exchanged the truth of God for falsehood, and worshiped and served the creature rather than the Creator."
It's nonsensical to remove the data of all the children who had other factors also associated with higher chances of neurodevelopmental disorders. Like you said, this study is used as the basis for vaccine policy for ALL CHILDREN, not just those who do not have any other risk factors.
And STILL the association didn't disappear after all that data manipulation!
https://www.newhumannewearthcommunities.com/reclaim-your-estate-birthright