If you don’t want to find something, don’t look for it, but if you are forced to look for it, look where you know it isn’t. Public health officials have become experts in not seeing the obvious. Autism is largely an immune-mediated condition, and the whole point of a vaccine is to change the behavior of the immune system. All research held out by Big Med is contrived to not see this thing that we all have seen, and that research has described, since 1943.
This has been the modus operandi of the medical establishment since the appearance of the autism epidemic in the mid 1990s. When a mom in Brick Township NJ notice that autism was suddenly everywhere in her town, she shamed the CDC into looking into it. They showed up, confirmed that, yes, there was an epicenter of autism in Brick, and then swiftly left town to begin the cover up of both the autism epidemic, and their role in creating widespread neurological devastation of children in America.
If they had decided to come clean, instead of engaging in a cover up of vaccine injury that has now reached a level of global repercussions of which we never dreamed, my son may not have been injured in 2003, and our lives would be very different.
But rather than stopping what they were doing, admitting to what they had done, and cleaning up their mess, the medical establishment doubled down by issuing a nonsensical statement after the public learned of the massive doses of mercury in the vaccine schedule, as high as 500 times the daily safety limit set by the EPA.
From my chapter in the 2010 book Vaccine Epidemic: How Corporate Greed, Biased Science, and Coercive Government Threaten Our Human Rights, Our Health, and Our Children:
At the time, USPHS claimed that, “there [are] no data or evidence of any harm caused by the level of exposure that some children may have encountered in following the existing immunization schedule.”i
However, the government made this safety claim before it had begun to look for evidence of harm. In November 1999, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) initiated a study to evaluate whether children receiving the highest amounts of thimerosal had suffered any ill effects. Thomas Verstraeten,ii the study’s lead epidemiologist, did not begin the study until four months after the government’s “no evidence of harm” claim. The CDC did not publish the results until 2003.iii The first phase of the Verstraeten study found an association between higher doses of thimerosal and neurodevelopmental disorders. In the second phase of his study, Verstraeten described his findings as “neutral.”iv
HHS further asserted in July 1999:
Given that the risks of not vaccinating children far outweigh the unknown and much smaller risk, if any, of exposure to thimerosal-containing vaccines over the first six months of life, clinicians and parents are encouraged to immunize all infants even if the choice of individual vaccine products is limited for any reason.v (emphasis added)
With this single statement, the government took the position that the risk posed to children from exposure to thimerosal was both “unknown” and a “smaller risk” than exposure to childhood diseases. This suggested that public health officials could perform a risk-benefit analysis with no risk information for half of the equation.
HHS further asserted, “[i]nfants and children who have received thimerosal-containing vaccines do not need to be tested for mercury exposure.”vi On what basis could HHS make this statement? It had not done (and still has not done) the underlying research to show that these children were not at risk and should not be screened for mercury toxicity. Without hard evidence, government nonetheless seemed eager to reassure parents that “no evidence of harm” meant “no harm” – even as it failed to look for evidence.
i Joint Statement of the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) and the United States Public Health Service, July 7, 1999 4:15 PM, http://www.hhs.gov/nvpo/vacc_safe/bthi1.htm
ii Verstraeten was an employee of vaccine maker GlaxoSmithKline at the time his study was published. Verstraeten, Thomas. “Thimerosal, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, and GlaxoSmithKline”, Pediatrics, 2004;113;932.
iii Verstraeten T, Davis RL, DeStefano F, Lieu TA, Rhodes PH, Black SB, Shinefield H, Chen RT; Vaccine Safety Datalink Team. “Safety of thimerosal-containing vaccines: a two-phased study of computerized health maintenance organization databases.” Pediatrics 112 (2003): 1039–48.
iv Thomas Verstraeten, “Thimerosal, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, and GlaxoSmithKline”, Pediatrics, 2004;113;932, http://pediatrics.aappublications.org/cgi/reprint/113/4/932.pdf
v Joint Statement of the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) and the United States Public Health Service, July 7, 1999 4:15 PM, http://www.hhs.gov/nvpo/vacc_safe/bthi1.htm
vi Joint Statement of the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) and the United States Public Health Service, July 7, 1999 4:15 PM, http://www.hhs.gov/nvpo/vacc_safe/bthi1.htm
And with that the die was cast before the beginning of the 21st century. Public Health, Big Med, and Pharma have been asserting the absurd ever since then, killing trust in their own vaccine program, while simultaneously wondering why fewer and fewer people trust the vaccine program.
While they have been busy for the last 25 years shouting into the media megaphones that vaccines don’t cause autism, quietly going on in the background were hundreds of studies that show not only that they do cause autism, but HOW they cause autism.
In 2007 during the start of the Omnibus Autism hearings in the VICP, I got tired of hearing “No evidence of any link” in the mockingbird media, and started posting papers to my little mommy blog that said otherwise. And over the years the list of papers grew. It was not like I had a career or a social life. I was a vaccine injury mother. We don’t go out to bars or social events, we stay home, take care of our little ones, and read the whole internet.
When the list of papers got above 60 or so, I thought it was time to move it to a more suitable location where it could be managed a bit more easily. I uploaded the list to ScribD where it grew by another 100 or so citations.
Then in 2020 the lock downs arrived, my social media was mostly wiped out, prominent doctors started coming into the health freedom movement (I call them the Covid Cohort) and I decided that it was time to take my little family into the ark and close up the door. We spent two years enjoying each other’s company, fixing up our house in Maine, selling it, and moving to South Carolina.
In 2022 Elon bought Twitter and suddenly open communication was allowed again! We were settled into our new home by Christmas, and I got back online in earnest. I noticed that many rank and file HHS trusting Americans were waking up to the Covid Corruption and were musing out loud that if CDC et. al. had lied about the Covid vaccines being “safe and effective,” that maybe they were lying about the safety of the childhood schedule as well. Perhaps vaccines did cause autism after all?
I checked in on my abandoned ScribD list and saw that it had one million views. I thought it might be time to get back to work on it.
Then new comer to the vaccine injury fight Steve Kirsch posted this on Twitter:
224 thousand views and almost 6k likes told me I definitely needed to get back to work.
So I did, and now I present to you, HowDoVaccinesCauseAutism.org.
It is really just the science, with as little editorializing as is needed in order to give the site context. 212 published papers thus far, and two pages from me, a welcome page, and an FAQ.
The research is listed by date (1943 to 2023 spanning 80 years), categorized at the top by the major issues, categorized on the side menu by keywords, completely searchable, and with sections and excerpts highlighted so that new readers of research can understand where even complicated papers fit into the autism causation puzzle.
Want to understand the big picture on how aluminum adjuvants are associated with autism? Want to understand what a cytokine is and how it is involved in autism regressions after vaccination? Want to search to see how many papers on the list are from Harvard? Curious to read the papers published linking vaccines and autism before Andrew Wakefield ever set foot in medical school? Want to see how your child’s test results line up with the known research on autism, vaccines, autoimmunity, brain inflammation and gastrointestinal damage? Spend a week on it and make it your playground.
Clock your time on the site and see how long it takes you to be convinced that the American Academy of Pediatrics is lying to you when it claims that, “Vaccines are not associated with autism” and decide if you still want to take your child to an AAP member, or instead find another medical practitioner to entrust with your child’s health.
And let me know what you think of the site. How can I make it more usable for you?
Feel free to send it to your senator, doctor, school nurse, or mother-in-law.
Finally, the address of the site may look familiar to some of you. Around ten years ago, internet trolls started leaving messages like this around social media:
When the link was clicked by those who were earnestly seeking to understand what was going on, they were met with the following:
The site is still up, and I felt that using the .ORG of the same address made a good contrast between the ignorance and cruelty of the other side, and the earnest truth seeking, humanitarian service of our side.
Share this post